guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#state-of-mayflower-v-voync
This is the start of #state-of-mayflower-v-voync channel.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-01 08:29 p.m.
New Case
Case Type
criminal
Case Number
CR-104-25
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:06 p.m.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-05-02 02:23 a.m.
Reassigned to @ryan
Brenda
Brenda 2025-05-02 05:14 p.m.
ive reassigned it on the website as well @ryan
ryanryan used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-02 07:19 p.m.
Case Modified
@ryan has added @Funpark22 to the case channel.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-02 07:20 p.m.
You are to have a charging document and AoPC within 16 hours
ryan
ryan 2025-05-02 07:20 p.m.
should you fail, this will be dismissed for failure to prosecute
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 12:51 a.m.
Correction, a typorgraphical error was made on count three, where the count isn't listed as a misdeanor or a felony. @ryan Would you allow me to quickly refile to fix the issue?
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 12:51 a.m.
misdemeanor*
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:14 a.m.
idrc
Funpark22Funpark22
Courtesy copy
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:15 a.m.
It isn't a courtesy copy, when you are on my docket
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:16 a.m.
It is required
ryanryan
It isn't a courtesy copy, when you are on my docket
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:16 a.m.
It's just because I file it on the website
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:16 a.m.
It's nice of me to post it here as well
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:16 a.m.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:16 a.m.
and I see your 3rd rule
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:16 a.m.
It is equired actually
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:16 a.m.
required
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:16 a.m.
yes thank you
ryanryan
idrc
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:17 a.m.
Specifying misdemeanor vs felony is I believe required by criminal rules.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:17 a.m.
Yes and i idrc if u refile
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:17 a.m.
You could do 100000000000 filings and id be okay
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:17 a.m.
js make sure you comply w local rules king
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:17 a.m.
Alright
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:18 a.m.
I just don't feel like being swarmed with MTDs about a failure to follow local criminal rules.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:18 a.m.
Lol
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:18 a.m.
Let me fix that
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:18 a.m.
well
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:18 a.m.
you see
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:19 a.m.
you've already specified
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:19 a.m.
For 1 and 2
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:19 a.m.
But not 3
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:19 a.m.
I failed to specfiy that unlicensed possession of a firearm is in fact a felony.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:19 a.m.
also PC established
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:19 a.m.
wunderbar!
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:19 a.m.
Theres a THIRD ?!
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:19 a.m.
oh my GOD
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:20 a.m.
scroll
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:20 a.m.
this is CRAZY
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:20 a.m.
Normal day
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:21 a.m.
Dated and added the classification for count 3
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:22 a.m.
and filed
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-03 01:22 a.m.
CC: @ryan
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 01:22 a.m.
:❤️:
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 03:00 a.m.
@Funpark22
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 03:07 a.m.
Minute Order Regarding Sua Sponte Dismissal

The State's Information filed this 3rd of May, 2025, is dismissed sua sponte for failure to follow local rules. Namely, the State failed to adhere to Mayfl. LR 4 (4)(3) by filing a complaint that is antagonistic to formal court standards in form and substance. Specifically, the State's information contained wanton grammatical errors that detract from the aesthetic nature of the document. These errors are offensive to the Court, the State, and the people the State serves through criminal prosecution. To this extent, the Court is left no choice but to strike the document. Mayfl. LR 4 (4)(3); State v. B_lindedd, CR-0079-25 (Mayfl. D. Ct. 2025); __State v. Chetahracer2000, CR-0091-25 (Mayfl D. Ct. 2025).
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 07:56 p.m.
Well ig struck is the right word
ryanryan
Minute Order Regarding Sua Sponte Dismissal The State's Information filed this 3rd of May, 2025, is dismissed sua sponte for failure to follow local rules. Namely, the State...
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 07:56 p.m.
Amend to say *struck please
ryan
ryan 2025-05-03 08:00 p.m.
You may refile within 36 hours @Funpark22
ryanryan
Minute Order Regarding Sua Sponte Dismissal The State's Information filed this 3rd of May, 2025, is dismissed sua sponte for failure to follow local rules. Namely, the State...
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:40 a.m.
Did you not just find PC?
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:40 a.m.
And also please can you specify the "wanton grammatical errors?"
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:40 a.m.
I find PC but your submission violates the local rules hun
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:41 a.m.
No oxford comma to start
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:41 a.m.
Plus, your CI contains surplusage so it'll be struck anyway
ryanryan
No oxford comma to start
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:42 a.m.
Where do you think that comma should go?
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:42 a.m.
My AAG even approved this
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:42 a.m.
Who's your AAG
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:42 a.m.
Adam
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:43 a.m.
Checks
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:43 a.m.
Everything in yellow is surplus
ryanryan
Checks
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:44 a.m.
"who is not authorized to possess it" follows statutory language
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:44 a.m.
The statute declares peace officers and nat guard
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:44 a.m.
Not illegal firearms strictly
ryanryan
No oxford comma to start
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:44 a.m.
Again, what comma in that series did I miss?
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:45 a.m.
Funpark22Funpark22
Again, what comma in that series did I miss?
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:45 a.m.
We'll get there
Funpark22Funpark22
"who is not authorized to possess it" follows statutory language
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:45 a.m.
And yet it is unnecessary?
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:45 a.m.
it is surplus
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:45 a.m.
If remove the "surplus" and I get a MTD for failure to follow statutory langauge
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:45 a.m.
language
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:45 a.m.
For that case
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:46 a.m.
For the absense of the "surplus"
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:46 a.m.
What happens.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:48 a.m.
Your honor, I can start spitting out case law about background on cases not being surplus

For example,

“As long as the statutory scheme is coherent and consistent, there generally is no need for a court to inquire beyond the plain language of the statute” United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, 489 U.S. 235 (1989)

"Moreover, the [Second Circuit] has affirmed that background paragraphs need not be stricken from an indictment where they are relevant to the crimes charged” United States v. Colon-Ledee, 785 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.P.R.2010).
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:48 a.m.
ignore that first case law
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:48 a.m.
Bottom line
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:49 a.m.
I'm simply confused, your honor.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:49 a.m.
Your complaint is deficient
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:49 a.m.
you first grant PC
Funpark22Funpark22
I'm simply confused, your honor.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:49 a.m.
And you're not helping me explain it to you
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:49 a.m.
Then immediately turn around and say NOPE
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:49 a.m.
My apologies, your honor.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:49 a.m.
I've had a long day
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:49 a.m.
and it's 12:50 AM for me
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:50 a.m.
1. You note a missing comma in a series of words
2. "who is not authorized to possess it" and "a gun the Defendant Brandished and discharged" is surplus.
3. "the defendant turned a firearm on" and "a recognized firearm within the state" is surplus
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:50 a.m.
I'll get these fixed within those 36 hours from your order.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:51 a.m.
Again apologies for my outlandish refute. It's late.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-05-04 01:52 a.m.
(can anyone from this case confirm what filings are accepted/denied - the websitehas a bunch of them backed up for this case)
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:53 a.m.
You've also stated you'd get there in terms of telling me the location of the comma. That comma being the primary reason you dismissed the case. That absence of a comma exhibiting "wanton grammatical errors that detract from the aesthetic nature of the document. These errors are offensive to the Court, the State, and the people the State serves through criminal prosecution. To this extent, the Court is left no choice but to strike the document."
KezzeraKezzera
(can anyone from this case confirm what filings are accepted/denied - the websitehas a bunch of them backed up for this case)
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:54 a.m.
Well no filings have shown up on the website
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:54 a.m.
So
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:54 a.m.
I'm sure your honor can give an answer.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-05-04 01:55 a.m.
@Underprothonotary
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:56 a.m.
Okay I am back
Funpark22Funpark22
Then immediately turn around and say NOPE
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:57 a.m.
Please stop trying to say that my finding of PC is not to say that your complaint is perfect
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:57 a.m.
It's not, that is foolish
KezzeraKezzera
(can anyone from this case confirm what filings are accepted/denied - the websitehas a bunch of them backed up for this case)
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:57 a.m.
Amended info is struck
✅1
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:58 a.m.
The issue comes that, you double allege things.
ryanryan
Amended info is struck
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:58 a.m.
The amended info has a date and a classification of a chrge
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:58 a.m.
If you strike the amended, you might as well strike the original
ryanryan
Click to see attachment.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:58 a.m.
Here for example, "the defendant turned a firearm on..." then you state "Defendant...drew a weapon."
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 01:59 a.m.
I'll let you finish, apologies.
ryanryan
Amended info is struck
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-05-04 01:59 a.m.
ok, original and aopc was filed in your case - strike these off if necessary
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-05-04 01:59 a.m.
@Underprothonotary from here
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-05-04 01:59 a.m.
doing cleanups of filings
Funpark22Funpark22
I'll let you finish, apologies.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 01:59 a.m.
I find trouble thinking that these two allegations are ANY different from each other?
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:00 a.m.
If he turned a firearm upon, surely he drew a firearm too
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:02 a.m.
First, it's lazy and shows your AAG didn't do his job. Second, you do not need to include the exact statutory language to be fine, you just need to, in a vacuum, establish that the words of the count constitute a violation under the statute in question. Third, if you cite a case, the factual pattern should be similar. If you want to stand by Colon-Ledeeyou better hope that the factual pattern is similar or it'll be your ass
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:02 a.m.
The issue I have is everything I've highlighted is LITERALLY unnecessary to establish a violation and is, thus, surplusage
Funpark22Funpark22
Where do you think that comma should go?
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:02 a.m.
between Gun and "and"
Funpark22Funpark22
If you strike the amended, you might as well strike the original
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:03 a.m.
The amended was nullified the moment you filed the amended
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:04 a.m.
Also in the discharging count you state "a recognized firearm within the State," how does that add to your complaint when you use the word firearm before?
ryanryan
between Gun and "and"
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:05 a.m.
I see
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:05 a.m.
@ryan your honor, all of these surplusages and lack of a comma concluded break the rule of "all filings should maintain a clean, professional appearance, consistent with formal court standards." LR4(4)(3)
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:06 a.m.
I just want to clarify that I don't break this rule again.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:06 a.m.
And that I have everything you'r targetting.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:06 a.m.
you're*
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:06 a.m.
break of the rule*
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:06 a.m.
Surplus also violates Crim rules btw
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:06 a.m.
breaking*
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:06 a.m.
You're fine counselor
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:06 a.m.
Yes, i have an issue with anything highlighted
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:06 a.m.
Can I ask a question
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:06 a.m.
The grammar issue is ignorable in the face of surplus
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:07 a.m.
Absolutely, i always encourage it
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:07 a.m.
I first alleged this, but I didn't ask the question in regard to thus:
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:07 a.m.
You find probable cause following my sending of the amended CI. You then later decide to dismiss it. My question is why didn't you dismiss it before finding PC?
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:08 a.m.
Because typically upon finding probable cause, a summons and a deputy are ready to go.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:08 a.m.
This is off the top of my head at 1:09 am
Funpark22Funpark22
This is off the top of my head at 1:09 am
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:08 a.m.
Same bro
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:09 a.m.
I got aork at 10 :😭:
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:09 a.m.
But PC ≠ your complaint being fine
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:09 a.m.
I said this earlier, but i looked at your complaint in a vacuum without any regard for the formatting or surplus
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:10 a.m.
Your complaint in a vacuum does meet PC, but it doesn't change the fact that it violates rules of procedures
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:10 a.m.
To me, those are separate issues
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:11 a.m.
And the fact that the complaint is struck does not absolve the Defendant of the case
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:15 a.m.
Ok, I'll add the comma and remove the surplusage.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:15 a.m.
I appreicate you finding my errors now, so in the future they don't have to reoccur in possibly a more prestigious case.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:17 a.m.
Yea ofc
ryanryan
Yea ofc
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:18 a.m.
Would you like me refile the case entirely due to this being "dismissed" or do you just want me to file a new ci
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 02:18 a.m.
superceding ci
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:21 a.m.
New ci
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 02:21 a.m.
Pls
Funpark22Funpark22
1. You note a missing comma in a series of words 2. "who is not authorized to possess it" and "a gun the Defendant Brandished and discharged" is surplus. 3. "the defendant turned a...
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-04 03:05 a.m.
@ryan Is this correct?
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 11:56 p.m.
Correct
ryan
ryan 2025-05-04 11:56 p.m.
Yes
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-05 01:54 a.m.
@ryan crossing my fingers this time
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:08 a.m.
"intentionally killed kemchimi with intent to kill..."
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:08 a.m.
"the Defendant showed up behind the
defendant, brandished a Protec DC9 Submachine Gun, and randomly began to fire upon
kemchimi, killing kemchimi."
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:08 a.m.
You've double alleged intent AND the killing
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:08 a.m.
Surplusage, struck
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:08 a.m.
^^ count 1
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:09 a.m.
"discharged a firearm within the City of Mersea, to wit, the Defendant went behind kemchimi,
drew a weapon, and then began to discharge a Protec DC9 Submachine Gun.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:09 a.m.
^^ Count 2 struck
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:09 a.m.
Count 3 is probably fine
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:09 a.m.
Did your AAG review this @Funpark22
ryanryan used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-05 02:10 a.m.
Case Modified
@ryan has added @AdamC_2001 to the case channel.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:10 a.m.
Hi Adam
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:11 a.m.
I'm adding you here too because you're his boss, you're supposed to review his work and you've done a piss poor job
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:11 a.m.
At this point, it's on you, and i want you to be aware of what's happened here
ryanryan
Did your AAG review this @Funpark22
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:14 a.m.
We're going to have a quick teaching moment.
"On or about the 15th of April, 2025, within Clark County, Mayflower, the defendant
intentionally killed kemchimi with intent to kill, to wit, the Defendant showed up behind the
defendant, brandished a Protec DC9 Submachine Gun, and randomly began to fire upon
kemchimi, killing kemchimi."
If you'd revise it to say:
"On or about the 15th of April, 2025, the Defendant, to wit, within Clark County, Mayflower, did intentionally and knowingly fire upon the victim, kemchimi, utilizing a Protec DC9 submachine gun, resulting in and causing their death."
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:16 a.m.
Count two reads:
"On or about the 15th of April, 2025, within Clark County, Mayflower, the Defendant
discharged a firearm within the City of Mersea, to wit, the Defendant went behind kemchimi,
drew a weapon, and then began to discharge a Protec DC9 Submachine Gun."
If you'd revise it to say:
"On or about the 15th of April, 2025, the Defendant did, to wit, knowingly and intentionally discharge a firearm, specifically a Protect DC9, within the city limits of Mersa, Mayflower."
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 02:16 a.m.
Do you see the difference
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-05 08:49 a.m.
@ryan I’ve been taught to write cis by statutory language then “to wit” then descending into particulars
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-05 08:49 a.m.
I’ve had cis approved with this structure every other case I have been in
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-05 08:50 a.m.
Some of the stuff you point out wasn’t even changed from the first
ryanryan
You've double alleged intent AND the killing
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-05 08:51 a.m.
That’s the literal statutory language
Funpark22Funpark22
@ryan I’ve been taught to write cis by statutory language then “to wit” then descending into particulars
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-05 08:52 a.m.
This format has also been in cis Adam has approved
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-05 08:53 a.m.
Adam hasn’t revised this version because:

1. He approved the OG. These are simple changes to it

2. I had 36 hours
A. He was at a concert
B. I was waiting for your confirmation to my question
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-05 08:54 a.m.
So I simply find it odd that in one courtroom a specific ci is wanted yet in another you want this
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 10:56 a.m.
You find it odd?
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 10:56 a.m.
I find it odd that the DoJ is failing to train its prosecutors effectively
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 10:57 a.m.
When I said can the surplusage, I meant stop doubling alleging stuff
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 10:57 a.m.
"Whoever intentionally kills another with intent to kill or commit great bodily harm shall be guilty of a felony."
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 10:57 a.m.
You DONT need to exactly mirror the statutory language
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 10:58 a.m.
If you say someone intended to kill another then that's it!
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 10:58 a.m.
Defendant did intentionally kill victim.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 10:58 a.m.
That would be sufficient under the statute
Funpark22Funpark22
So I simply find it odd that in one courtroom a specific ci is wanted yet in another you want this
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 10:59 a.m.
I want you to stop putting surplus in your CI
Funpark22Funpark22
This format has also been in cis Adam has approved
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 10:59 a.m.
I do not care if Adam has approved them. Adam approving something is NOT evidence that it is okay in all court rooms
Funpark22Funpark22
@ryan I’ve been taught to write cis by statutory language then “to wit” then descending into particulars
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 11:00 a.m.
That is bad practice when it leads to surplusage
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 11:00 a.m.
Because you end up double-alleging stuff and that's surplusage, whoever taught you that should be sacked lowkey
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 11:01 a.m.
I've given you the key on how to fix your issue in this chat
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-05 04:53 p.m.
I’ll file superseding today
ryanryan
I find it odd that the DoJ is failing to train its prosecutors effectively
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-05 04:57 p.m.
This is my first ci that I actually have an issue with it out of the many I have authored
ryanryan
When I said can the surplusage, I meant stop doubling alleging stuff
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-05 04:57 p.m.
Apologies for not seeing that earlier
Funpark22Funpark22
Apologies for not seeing that earlier
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 05:22 p.m.
You're fine
Funpark22Funpark22
This is my first ci that I actually have an issue with it out of the many I have authored
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 05:22 p.m.
Most don't care to do it
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 05:22 p.m.
I have been doing this perhaps too long so I apologize if I've come across rude
ryan
ryan 2025-05-05 05:23 p.m.
But times like these can be very good teaching moments
ryanryan
You DONT need to exactly mirror the statutory language
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:00 a.m.
"Rather, as long as the statutory scheme is coherent and consistent, there generally is no need for a court to inquire beyond the plain language of the statute." See United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. 489 U.S. 235,240-241

:👍:
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:02 a.m.
Come back here when you can cite and italicize your cases properly lil bro
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:02 a.m.
:/
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:02 a.m.
I will keep you here
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:02 a.m.
What's the proper way to get the page numbers....
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:02 a.m.
until you fix your mistakes
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:02 a.m.
Case number is 489 U.S. 235
Funpark22Funpark22
What's the proper way to get the page numbers....
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:02 a.m.
You forgot a year, your thing is spaced incorrectly
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:03 a.m.
AND worse of all
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:03 a.m.
the worst of all
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:03 a.m.
you italicized EVERYTHING
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:03 a.m.
Rookie mistake
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:03 a.m.
489 U.S. 235, 109 S. Ct. 1026, 103 L. Ed. 2d 290, 57 U.S.L.W. 4256, 20 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 267, 63 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 652, 18 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1150, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1041
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:03 a.m.
Is that any better?
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:03 a.m.
Very much so.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:03 a.m.
Page numbers follow the 235, correct?
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:03 a.m.
Correct but you didn't put a year
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:03 a.m.
so you didnt follow bluebook
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:04 a.m.
" 20 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 267, 63 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 652, 18 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1150"
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:04 a.m.
I can take that part out^^^
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:04 a.m.
This word be correct
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:04 a.m.
I've told you the issue was the year
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:05 a.m.
ALSO just because your complaint can contain the statutory language and be fine, that doesn't disprove my point
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:05 a.m.
United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises 489 U.S. 235,240-241 (1989)
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:06 a.m.
@ryan Would you prefer I simply put the text of the counts in here first, so I don't keep clogging up the site.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:06 a.m.
Absolutely!
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:07 a.m.
Also
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:07 a.m.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:07 a.m.
You approved count 3
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:07 a.m.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:07 a.m.
fired*
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:08 a.m.
Correct
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:08 a.m.
Count 3 is awesome
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:08 a.m.
Very good actually
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:08 a.m.
You should be happy
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:08 a.m.
I'll only be happy until I get this right the first time.
ryanryan
Click to see attachment.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:09 a.m.
a comma is correct.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:10 a.m.
Funpark22Funpark22
a comma is correct.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:10 a.m.
I didn't say a comma wasn't
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:11 a.m.
I said you didnt put a space after the comma which is NOT
ryanryan
Click to see attachment.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:11 a.m.
What are you annotating?
ryanryan
Click to see attachment.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:11 a.m.
oh. I thought # as what you wanted to replace the comma.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:11 a.m.
Funpark22Funpark22
oh. I thought # as what you wanted to replace the comma.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:11 a.m.
Nope my fault there
ryanryan
Click to see attachment.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:12 a.m.
What's in brackets is useless because you already said "the Defendant intentionally and knowing fire..."
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:12 a.m.
Why would you need to, in the same count, talk about discharging a firearm twice?
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:12 a.m.
That's been the main issue with stuf
ryanryan
Click to see attachment.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:13 a.m.
what is the "d"
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:13 a.m.
the letter d
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:13 a.m.
began to discharge
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:13 a.m.
please insert the letter d
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:13 a.m.
began to discharged
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:13 a.m.
No you remove began to
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:13 a.m.
I see
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:13 a.m.
I forgot to put the loop
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:13 a.m.
began to discharge -> discharged
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:14 a.m.
passive voice doesn't make sense here
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:15 a.m.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:15 a.m.
Also superseding
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:15 a.m.
fixed
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:15 a.m.
Is this good, your honor?
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:17 a.m.
Count 2 is fine yes
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:17 a.m.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:17 a.m.
THis is nitpicky
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:17 a.m.
but with those minor edits we'll be in business
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:17 a.m.
Is this still okay though?
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:17 a.m.
Yes sir
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:18 a.m.
Can you take the above filing
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:18 a.m.
i GUESS
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:18 a.m.
Yea sure
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:18 a.m.
Or would you still like me to fix it
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:18 a.m.
Nah ur chillin
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 12:18 a.m.
as I don't want to keep going back and forth
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:18 a.m.
Just in the in future to wit is basically business
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:18 a.m.
useless*
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:18 a.m.
And ideally you want your sentences to read coherently and concisely
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:18 a.m.
But yes
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:18 a.m.
Okay
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 12:18 a.m.
let me summon the defendant
ryan
ryan 2025-05-06 09:18 p.m.
Defendant in absentia
ryanryan
Defendant in absentia
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-06 10:22 p.m.
Unable to find the Defendant?
ryanryan used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-06 10:33 p.m.
Case Modified
@ryan has added @JaroCycle to the case channel.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-07 02:13 a.m.
@JaroCycle james assigned u as PD
ryan
ryan 2025-05-07 02:14 a.m.
are u able to represnet the defendant to the capacity imposed upon you by the constitution and the laws of this state
JaroCycle
JaroCycle 2025-05-07 02:38 a.m.
Yes
ryan
ryan 2025-05-07 05:48 p.m.
Okay
ryan
ryan 2025-05-07 05:48 p.m.
Pre trial will start at 5P CDT (12 minutes) and will last 240 hours ending 5P CDT 5/17
ryan
ryan 2025-05-07 05:48 p.m.
Pretrial motions are due 5P CDT 5/15
ryan
ryan 2025-05-07 05:49 p.m.
State must produce all Brady disclosure before 5P CDT 5/10
ryan
ryan 2025-05-07 05:49 p.m.
Defense will have until 5P 5/11 to file any disclosures
ryan
ryan 2025-05-07 05:49 p.m.
@JaroCycle @Funpark22
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-07 09:43 p.m.
@JaroCycle If you can conjure up any discovery motions first, that would be greatly appreciated.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-07 09:43 p.m.
If you decide to make those motions^^^
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-10 12:21 p.m.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-10 12:23 p.m.
and filed
Funpark22Funpark22
Click to see attachment.
ryan
ryan 2025-05-10 04:53 p.m.
Perfect, for future reference please ping both myself and @JaroCycle
ryanryan
Perfect, for future reference please ping both myself and @JaroCycle
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-10 10:02 p.m.
Np, apologies.
ryanryan
Perfect, for future reference please ping both myself and @JaroCycle
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-10 10:49 p.m.
I invite @hackbucket as my co-counsel
ryan
ryan 2025-05-11 01:26 a.m.
Okay !
ryanryan
Okay !
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-11 02:28 a.m.
Could you add him, your honor?
ryan
ryan 2025-05-11 02:31 a.m.
Okay
ryanryan used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-11 02:31 a.m.
Case Modified
@ryan has added @hackbucket to the case channel.
ryanryan
Pre trial will start at 5P CDT (12 minutes) and will last 240 hours ending 5P CDT 5/17
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-19 11:17 p.m.
@ryan Ready for trial, your honor?
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-23 12:58 a.m.
@ryan
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-29 01:25 a.m.
@ryan
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-05-30 04:29 p.m.
@Kezzera Can this get moving?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-05-30 05:07 p.m.
Mark
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-05-30 05:07 p.m.
@Underprothonotary Reassign
Brenda
Brenda 2025-05-30 05:15 p.m.
Reassigned to @Richostein
Richostein
Richostein 2025-06-01 03:04 p.m.
@Funpark22 where was this left off
RichosteinRichostein
@Funpark22 where was this left off
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-06-01 10:50 p.m.
Pre trial ended on 5/17.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-06-01 10:50 p.m.
Discovery was submitted
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-06-01 10:50 p.m.
Defense has been dead
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-06-01 10:50 p.m.
I literally have this entire case mapped out
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-06-01 10:50 p.m.
The State simply wants trial.
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-06-02 07:07 a.m.
@voync
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-06-02 07:14 a.m.
Defendant has been held indefinitely in detention until appearance @Funpark22
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-06-02 07:14 a.m.
Not much we can do as he doesn’t have a discord account and is most likely an alt
BrendaBrenda used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-24 01:31 a.m.
Case Modified
@Brenda has added @acarlyle to the case channel.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-06-24 03:26 a.m.
Good day.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-06-25 10:38 p.m.
Hola!
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-06-26 08:07 a.m.
@Funpark22 what is happening here Mr State Attorney
shah_khaled ᴘᴄshah_khaled ᴘᴄ
Defendant has been held indefinitely in detention until appearance @Funpark22
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-06-26 10:24 p.m.
a
Richostein
Richostein 2025-06-27 11:42 a.m.
We'll keep this open for a few weeks incase defendant chooses to appear @Funpark22 @acarlyle
RichosteinRichostein
We'll keep this open for a few weeks incase defendant chooses to appear @Funpark22 @acarlyle
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-06-27 11:07 p.m.
Noted
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-07-02 03:21 p.m.
@Richostein I have been contacted by the defendant
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-07-02 03:24 p.m.
@Richostein Can the Defendant be served according to the Criminal Rules of Procedure please :🙂:
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-07-02 03:24 p.m.
@CompaEmber
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-07-02 10:57 p.m.
Defendant also sent me a message but deleted it
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-07-02 10:57 p.m.
Ik due to a message request sent to me
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-07-02 10:57 p.m.
no proof
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-07-02 10:57 p.m.
Just notifying the court
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-07-04 03:09 p.m.
@Kezzera please reassign this
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-07-04 03:10 p.m.
I notified the court 2 days ago of my client coming around. And not so much as a message from the judge sunfr
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-07-04 03:10 p.m.
since
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-07-04 03:11 p.m.
@Richostein you need to respond
Funpark22Funpark22
Click to see attachment.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-07-05 09:16 a.m.
@Kezzera Again. Still nothing
acarlyleacarlyle
@Kezzera Again. Still nothing
Richostein
Richostein 2025-07-05 12:58 p.m.
Let my clerk know next time
Richostein
Richostein 2025-07-05 12:58 p.m.
They'll be able to add him here
RichosteinRichostein used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-05 12:58 p.m.
Case Modified
@Richostein has added @CompaEmber to the case channel.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-07-05 12:59 p.m.
@CompaEmber respond to indicate ur present
RichosteinRichostein
@CompaEmber respond to indicate ur present
CompaEmber
CompaEmber 2025-07-05 02:03 p.m.
yo
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-07-05 04:20 p.m.
Defense is ready for trial your Honor.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-07-10 04:50 p.m.
@Kezzera icl, but this is long
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-07-13 02:05 a.m.
@Nicklaus pls get this reassigned
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-07-13 01:06 p.m.
@Xerxy
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-07-22 10:07 a.m.
@Richostein ?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-07-24 12:22 p.m.
@Kezzera once again
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:39 p.m.
ok yeah we're gonna reassign this
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:40 p.m.
@Richostein
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-07-28 10:40 p.m.
@Underprothonotary NOTE Reassignment: X4410(edited)
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-01 09:42 p.m.
Friendly reminder that I will be out from August 3rd all the way to August 8th
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-03 09:40 p.m.
@Kezzera this has yet to be re-assigned
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-08-03 11:43 p.m.
i'll just do it myself
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-04 12:03 p.m.
I’m gonna be retired by the time this comes to a close.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-08-04 08:10 p.m.
I am back
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-08-04 08:10 p.m.
this has been marked for re-assignment
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.
patience is appreciated while we sort our mess
shah_khaled ᴘᴄshah_khaled ᴘᴄ used
/summon
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-09 07:23 p.m.
:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @CompaEmber(edited)
shah_khaled ᴘᴄshah_khaled ᴘᴄ used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-09 07:23 p.m.
Case Modified
@krm has added @CompaEmber to the case channel.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-08-09 07:31 p.m.
Welcome Mr voync.

We are now going to arraign you. I will now advise you of your rights, please read carefully.

1. You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say may be used against you in court.
2. You have the right to a speedy and public trial.
3. You have the right to see, hear, and question all witnesses called to testify against you.
4. You have the right to present evidence on your own behalf.
5. You have the right to testify in your own defense, but you cannot be forced to do so. If you choose not to testify, your silence cannot be held against you.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-08-09 07:31 p.m.
@CompaEmber
Richostein
Richostein 2025-08-09 07:31 p.m.
@acarlyle
Richostein
Richostein 2025-08-09 07:31 p.m.
Do u understand these rights
Richostein
Richostein 2025-08-10 05:44 p.m.
MINUTE ORDER The Court sets this matter for arraignment to occur within twenty-four (24) hours of the entry of this Order. Defendant is hereby ordered to appear at the time and place designated in the scheduling order to be issued forthwith. Failure to appear as directed will result in Defendant being taken into custody and held in indefinite detention until such time as the arraignment is completed and further order of the Court is entered.
Signed District Judge Richard Cornwall (Entered 0/08/2025)
Richostein
Richostein 2025-08-10 05:44 p.m.
@acarlyle @CompaEmber
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-10 05:47 p.m.
Not guilty pleas were already entered, as the court decide to continue in absentia @Richostein
RichosteinRichostein
Do u understand these rights
CompaEmber
CompaEmber 2025-08-10 06:30 p.m.
Yeah
acarlyleacarlyle
Not guilty pleas were already entered, as the court decide to continue in absentia @Richostein
CompaEmber
CompaEmber 2025-08-10 06:31 p.m.
What he said not guilty plea
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-11 09:10 p.m.
State reiterates their readiness for trial
Richostein
Richostein 2025-08-12 04:22 p.m.
@Ocazius u can continue this case as magistrate, congratulations on the position!
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-12 04:44 p.m.
@acarlyle @Funpark22
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-12 04:46 p.m.
we're at trial point @Ocazius
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-12 04:48 p.m.
Just reading through, allow me a minute.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-12 06:03 p.m.
Alright this has been rather chaotic, let me sort some things out.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-12 06:04 p.m.
1. @acarlyle Is your client currently indefinitely imprisoned due to this case?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-12 06:10 p.m.
That was ordered by the court.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-12 06:33 p.m.
2. @acarlyle I understand that the state submitted discovery, but you did not have a chance to file any pre-trial submissions (discovery, motions etc). Is this correct?
OcaziusOcazius
2. @acarlyle I understand that the state submitted discovery, but you did not have a chance to file any pre-trial submissions (discovery, motions etc). Is this correct?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-12 06:44 p.m.
correct, I didnt because i came on this case as a replacement
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-12 06:45 p.m.
however I’m not aware of anything that requires disclosure
acarlyleacarlyle
however I’m not aware of anything that requires disclosure
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-12 06:46 p.m.
So you have absolutely no discovery or motions to submit to the court before we proceed to trial?
OcaziusOcazius
So you have absolutely no discovery or motions to submit to the court before we proceed to trial?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-12 07:09 p.m.
Just the defendant. Mr Voync
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-12 07:09 p.m.
thats all
acarlyleacarlyle
Just the defendant. Mr Voync
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-12 07:10 p.m.
Excuse me?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-12 07:10 p.m.
?
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-12 07:10 p.m.
I just asked you if you have any documents such as discovery or motions to submit to the court before we proceed to trial...
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-12 07:10 p.m.
'The defendant' is not a document you submit to the court
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-12 07:10 p.m.
No but he is a witness that I need to make known to the other party if I may use him at trial?
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-12 07:11 p.m.
Right, so please draft a discovery document including your witness list and any evidence you may have, and send it here ASAP.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-12 07:11 p.m.
And if you intend on writing any motions before we proceed to trial, please let me know now.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-12 07:11 p.m.
I have no motions
acarlyleacarlyle
I have no motions
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-12 07:16 p.m.
Then please get that discovery document to me soon.
OcaziusOcazius used
/timer
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 06:02 a.m.
Timer
Friday, August 15, 2025 at 6:02 a.m. (6 months ago)
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 06:02 a.m.
@acarlyle I'd like your discovery and any additional pretrial documents by then, preferrably before.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-13 11:24 a.m.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-13 11:24 a.m.
@Ocazius @Funpark22
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-13 11:24 a.m.
Defense asks that this trial be conducted asynchronous
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-13 11:24 a.m.
Starting today
acarlyleacarlyle
Click to see attachment.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 11:25 a.m.
Has this been filed with the website?
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 11:26 a.m.
I don't see it on there
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-13 11:26 a.m.
Im not added to the case, so I cant
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-13 11:27 a.m.
One of the clerks will have to add it.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 11:27 a.m.
I will add you now, perhaps you should have told me this before...
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 11:27 a.m.
Alright I have added you to the case
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 11:27 a.m.
Please upload it now.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-13 11:28 a.m.
Doje
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-13 11:28 a.m.
Done
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 11:28 a.m.
Alright.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 11:31 a.m.
Before we commence to trial, I'd like to set out the following rules for testimony questioning:

1. Questioning is to be carried out on discord in this channel.
2. When either of you call a witness to the stand, you have 48 hours to finish that witness. If you finish before, we will move onto the next questioning, and if you fail to finish, I will cut you off.
3. When an objection is made, the message must be in response to the objectioned content, and must provide a basis for the objection, expanding if required.
4. Questioning will not continue until I have ruled on an objection.
5. Do not question in posted blocks, ask singular questions.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 11:32 a.m.
@Funpark22 As the state's representative, you now have 12 hours to submit or forfeit your opening statement.
OcaziusOcazius used
/timer
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 11:32 a.m.
Timer
Wednesday, August 13, 2025 at 11:32 p.m. (6 months ago)
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 06:06 p.m.
@acarlyle Five hours...
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-13 06:07 p.m.
@Funpark22
OcaziusOcazius
@acarlyle Five hours...
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 06:18 p.m.
Wrong ping sorry
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 06:18 p.m.
@Funpark22
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 06:46 p.m.
@Funpark22 I would like to inform you that your lack of activity is not acceptable. If you are unable to find the time for something, you let the court know and you have the case assigned to another Justice Department employee. You have five hours to submit your opening statement, and unless you explicitly inform the court that the state waives its rights to an opening statement, I will hold you in contempt for delaying these proceedings.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-13 06:46 p.m.
(Once the timer is finished.)
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-13 09:46 p.m.
Your honor, I have school and a boat-ton of homework. I was online roughly 24 hours ago. Me not being online for 5 hours does NOT signal inactivity. I'll get this opening statement out as soon as possible.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-13 09:46 p.m.
Your 2nd rules of testimony will be tested here. I've been in cases where it's taken practically a week (hopefully that doesn't happen). But we all have lives.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-13 09:54 p.m.
# STATE'S OPENING

Hello, your honor. This is going to be your standard case, a random Defendant, engaged in unlawful, random, and uncalled for sudden murder. To wit, the Victim was simply on a ride along with an Officer when the Victim went afk. The car was later de-spawned and the Victim was still afk, standing defenseless on the sidewalk at the Mersea Car Dealership, within Mersea. Seconds later, the Defense without any reason, came up behind the Victim and began to brandish a Protec DC9, an illegal weapon. The Defendant then began to shoot the Victim, killing the Victim.

You’ll hear from the Victim, kemchimi, who’ll tell their story of how they got to the sidewalk, where the incident took place. kemchimi will also disclose that she was Afk, non-consenting of the attack, and didn’t interact with the Defendant previously. She’ll further explain that previous to being AFK, she was on a ride along.

On top of that, to prove the Protec DC9 is an actual Protec DC9, Mechanelize will be called. Mechanelize, which by using his law enforcement background, he will shine light on how the Defendant was brandishing the Protec DC9. Mechanelize will also share how the Protec DC9, according to the State-recognized State Firearms Registry, operated by the DOJ, is labeled as an illegal firearm. Mechanelize will not only share the firearm name and that it is illegal but will also tell you who can and cannot have illegal weapons on their person. The Defendant will not be one of those people that can have illegal weapons.

Finally, it is the goal of the State in this case to prove beyond the reasonable doubt that the Defendant, without a doubt, committed Second-Degree Murder, Discharging a Firearm in City limits, and Unlicensed possession of a firearm. The State’s job in this case is not only to simply get a guilty verdict but is to serve the people, especially the Victim in this case who was powerless and unable to defend themselves.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-14 12:34 a.m.
Defense waives opening
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-14 04:33 a.m.
@Funpark22 Call your first witness.
OcaziusOcazius used
/timer
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-14 05:16 a.m.
Timer
Thursday, August 14, 2025 at 5:16 p.m. (6 months ago)
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-14 08:41 a.m.
I call @kem
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-14 08:41 a.m.
Is it 48 from me calling or her/him getting an oath?
OcaziusOcazius used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-14 10:52 a.m.
Case Modified
@Ocazius has added @kem to the case channel.
OcaziusOcazius used
/administeroath
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-14 10:52 a.m.
@kem(edited)
Oath Selection
Which type of oath would you like to swear to?

Religious - Involves swearing to god that your testimony is, or will be, truthful.

Non-Religious - Solemnly affirms that your testimony is, or will be, truthful, under the pains and penalties of perjury.
Religious OathNon-Religious Oath
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-14 10:52 a.m.
@Funpark22 48 Hours begins now, @kem please choose one of the above.
clerkFlowBotclerkFlow
@kem
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-15 05:48 a.m.
@kem
Non-Religious Oath
Do you solemnly affirm that you will tell the truth, the whole truth, under the pains and penalties of perjury?
kem
kem 2025-08-15 05:49 a.m.
I do
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-15 06:03 a.m.
@Funpark22
OcaziusOcazius
@Funpark22 48 Hours begins now, @kem please choose one of the above.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-15 08:58 a.m.
Could I be given an additional 12 hours. I wasn’t online yesterday
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-15 08:59 a.m.
Busy all day
Funpark22Funpark22
Could I be given an additional 12 hours. I wasn’t online yesterday
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-15 09:07 a.m.
Instead of asking me for an extension, commence your questioning….???(edited)
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-15 09:08 a.m.
It’s been over three hours since the witness gave their oath
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-15 06:43 p.m.
Your honor, I have school. And at my school there’s 5k people on one WiFi
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-15 06:43 p.m.
So you’re never really hear my questions as the internet is slow on phones
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-15 06:44 p.m.
So I would like an 12 hr extension
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-15 06:44 p.m.
Please
kemkem
I do
kemkem
I do
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-15 06:46 p.m.
Maybe I could get the 48 hours here as now I have 19 hours less to ask questions due to when the oath was responded to.
Funpark22Funpark22
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-15 06:48 p.m.
With draw
Funpark22Funpark22
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-15 06:48 p.m.
Do you remember the replied? @kem
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-15 07:03 p.m.
Focus on your questioning, I'll grant an extension once we get a move on.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-16 04:36 a.m.
@kem 24 hours to answer the question before I hold you in contempt.
OcaziusOcazius used
/timer
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-16 04:36 a.m.
Timer
Sunday, August 17, 2025 at 4:36 a.m. (6 months ago)
kem
kem 2025-08-16 04:50 a.m.
Oops sorry
Funpark22Funpark22
Do you remember the replied? @kem
kem
kem 2025-08-16 04:50 a.m.
Yes I do
kem
kem 2025-08-16 04:50 a.m.
That was around April
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-16 03:57 p.m.
@Ocazius We are past 48 hours and the State has asked 1 question. This is beyond preposterous, Defense is invoking Speedy Trial. We want a conclusion to this witnesses direct examination testimony within the next 12 hours.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-16 03:57 p.m.
Better yet, we ask that this witness now be excused.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-16 04:13 p.m.
I will allow the State to continue for now. However, I will be setting a new rule - if a witness or counsel fails to respond within 18 hours of a question/response, they will be held in contempt. @Funpark22
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-16 04:13 p.m.
I am appalled by the inactivity here.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-16 05:30 p.m.
Your honor, I slept and went to a friend’s house. I do not have discord notifications on my phone. I cannot be at the ready at all times
kemkem
Yes I do
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-16 05:30 p.m.
Can you point yourself out?
Funpark22Funpark22
Can you point yourself out?
kem
kem 2025-08-16 05:33 p.m.
I am the one that is standing on the pavement after the vehicle is despawned
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-16 05:40 p.m.
Are we asking one question every day or smth?
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-16 06:00 p.m.
@acarlyle Stop talking during examination please
OcaziusOcazius
@acarlyle Stop talking during examination please
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-16 06:01 p.m.
What examination? Doesnt seem to be taking place.. I’m raising a perfectly valid question. This is taking forever, My client will be having grandkids by the time this witness is excused
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-16 06:06 p.m.
I have already addressed the state's untimelyness. If you wish to explicitly raise that further, then do so, but do not interject his attempted examination with your comments.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-16 06:32 p.m.
Fear not, I’ll revisit tomorrow when the daily question is asked.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-16 06:38 p.m.
@Funpark22 Speed this up
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-16 06:38 p.m.
If you're too busy, get this reassigned to another prosecutor.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-16 06:39 p.m.
I cannot reasonably believe that you are online for solely enough time to ask a couple questions.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-16 10:58 p.m.
Your honor, I'm on every day. Just because I have something else to do besides roblox doesn't mean I should be penalized. I have been on every day that I have been needed. @Ocazius Your honor, I have 3 other prosecutors who probably will be at the same activity as me or less. I have this case mapped out.
kemkem
I am the one that is standing on the pavement after the vehicle is despawned
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-16 10:59 p.m.
Where does this take place?
Funpark22Funpark22
Where does this take place?
kem
kem 2025-08-16 11:05 p.m.
Mersea, outside the CD
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-16 11:05 p.m.
@Ocazius Your honor, at this time I ask for this exhibit to entered as the trial’s exhibit A. For formalities.
Funpark22Funpark22
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-16 11:05 p.m.
*
Funpark22Funpark22
@Ocazius Your honor, at this time I ask for this exhibit to entered as the trial’s exhibit A. For formalities.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-17 03:56 a.m.
We object under Best Evidence Rule & Mayfl. R. Ev. 11(1)
Funpark22Funpark22
@Ocazius Your honor, at this time I ask for this exhibit to entered as the trial’s exhibit A. For formalities.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-17 08:26 a.m.
Denied.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-17 08:27 a.m.
I don’t know how you’ve gotten away with this in other cases, but you need to establish the authenticity of an exhibit through your questioning before seeking it to be entered into evidence.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-17 08:28 a.m.
i.e

‘Are you the owner of this video?’
‘Did you upload this video?’
‘Has it been altered in any way?’
‘Is this an accurate representation of the events coinciding with your memory?’

Etc
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-17 08:28 a.m.
Please continue questioning the witness and then move for it to be entered once you have done so.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-17 12:13 p.m.
Defense is moving for dismissal on the grounds of speedy trial violations. It has taken the State called this witness 3 days ago, was given 48 hours to question the witness, and we’re well past that now. The state has asked 3 questions in the 72 hours since the witness was called and sworn in. In furtherance of that, my client has sat indefinitely in jail for 2 months preceding the start of trial because the court failed to schedule trial with the state and defense properly.

These continued delays are prejudicing my client, and violating his right to a fair trial. As such Dismissal with Prejudice is warranted. @Ocazius @Funpark22
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-17 12:14 p.m.
@Richostein
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 01:01 p.m.
Was trial in game not an option here?
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 01:02 p.m.
It seems both the magistrate and the defense are calling me slow yet I was sleeping and am actively doing homework.
acarlyleacarlyle
Defense asks that this trial be conducted asynchronous
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 01:03 p.m.
We already decided it was to commence online
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 01:03 p.m.
It is not the state’s intention to drag this out for weeks on end
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 01:04 p.m.
It my job as the prosecutor in this case right now to ask questions to the witness
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 01:04 p.m.
It is out of my power how long it takes for the witness to respond d
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 01:04 p.m.
Or ever your honor to respond to my question
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 01:04 p.m.
Even*
Funpark22Funpark22
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 01:05 p.m.
@kem are you the owner of the replied video. For the record the replied is a downloadable copy from the medal link as the physical medal link is expired.
Funpark22Funpark22
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 01:07 p.m.
A - for record purposes
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 01:11 p.m.
For record purposes the physical expired medal link is in state’s discovery
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-17 02:28 p.m.
@Funpark22 When an opposing party makes a motion to dismiss, regardless of whether its paperless or not, you do not continue questioning.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-17 02:28 p.m.
I will allow you to make a papered or paperless response.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 03:30 p.m.
I’ll give my response in an hour or two
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 03:30 p.m.
I’m very busy
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 03:31 p.m.
Apologies for questioning during a motion
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 05:14 p.m.
I just finished my homework. Response will most likely will be even later than anticipated as I have other obligations like cooking for my family.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 05:14 p.m.
3-4 hours. Apologies again.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 05:34 p.m.
I also need to look at relative case law on this issue when I get the time.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 05:34 p.m.
Which'll be within that 3-4 hours
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 05:34 p.m.
Again apologies for this delay
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 10:39 p.m.
actively working on the response
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 11:16 p.m.
Response is written, I'm asking for feedback within my office before I submit.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-17 11:16 p.m.
Again apologies. State wasn't expecting a motion mid-trial.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-18 06:59 a.m.
Please hand it in soon.
OcaziusOcazius
Please hand it in soon.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-18 09:15 a.m.
Will file on website in 12 hours
Funpark22Funpark22
Will file on website in 12 hours
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-18 09:16 a.m.
Why?
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-18 03:19 p.m.
I am waiting.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-18 03:22 p.m.
Idk why you are waiting. You cant rule on it :😭:
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-18 03:56 p.m.
You seek attention worse than a little girl(edited)
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-18 03:56 p.m.
In a nice way
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-18 03:57 p.m.
Not sure why you continually feel the need to drop irrelevant and random comments but I guess that's just you :😂:
OcaziusOcazius
Not sure why you continually feel the need to drop irrelevant and random comments but I guess that's just you :😂:
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-08-18 04:31 p.m.
It isnt irrelevant at all. The fact that you think me pointing out an important procedural point is irrelevant is rather concerning, not less concerning than your attitude to counsel though.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-18 04:32 p.m.
:😂:
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-18 04:33 p.m.
Focus on your own attention
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-18 04:33 p.m.
and attitude
acarlyleacarlyle
It isnt irrelevant at all. The fact that you think me pointing out an important procedural point is irrelevant is rather concerning, not less concerning than your attitude to couns...
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-18 04:33 p.m.
Thank you so much counsel. I don’t know what I would do without you reminding me of a statutory boundary of my position.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-18 04:34 p.m.
I will recommend you for the Medal of Integrity and Community Service shortly.
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-08-18 04:34 p.m.
In the meantime, have fun with your speedy trial waiting for Mr. Cornwall to rule on your dismissal!
OcaziusOcazius
Why?
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-18 06:22 p.m.
Because I’m not doing it on my school iPad
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-18 06:22 p.m.
We already went over my phone at school has no WiFi
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-08-18 09:45 p.m.
submitted
OcaziusOcazius
In the meantime, have fun with your speedy trial waiting for Mr. Cornwall to rule on your dismissal!
CompaEmber
CompaEmber 2025-09-02 10:01 p.m.
Is this genuinely real?
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-09-02 10:04 p.m.
@Richostein Please, your honor.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-09-02 10:04 p.m.
The Defense's MTD is about a speedy trial
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-09-02 10:04 p.m.
Your own response is delaying this trial from proceeding further.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-09-02 10:04 p.m.
So, please!
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-09-02 10:05 p.m.
Give a ruling.
honkhonkhonkhonk used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-02 10:52 p.m.
Case Modified
@honkhonk has added @Richostein to the case channel.
honkhonk
honkhonk 2025-09-02 10:52 p.m.
Sorry discord messed with his perms
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-02 10:52 p.m.
@Funpark22 Hi
acarlyleacarlyle
Defense is moving for dismissal on the grounds of speedy trial violations. It has taken the State called this witness 3 days ago, was given 48 hours to question the witness, and we...
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-02 10:56 p.m.
Is the defendant still indef jailed?
RichosteinRichostein
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-09-02 11:03 p.m.
Yep, my 3 page baby.
RichosteinRichostein
Is the defendant still indef jailed?
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-09-02 11:04 p.m.
I believe so, yet he just appeared during his arraignment and [right now.](https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1367659105866743930/1412618576069922977)
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-02 11:04 p.m.
Alr
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-09-11 08:43 a.m.
@Richostein
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-09-21 05:46 p.m.
@Richostein
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-06 11:14 p.m.
@Richostein Hello?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 04:40 p.m.
@Funpark22 hello I am judge richo's clerk
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 04:40 p.m.
he cannot reach the case chat at the moment.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 04:40 p.m.
what do you need
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 04:41 p.m.
@Fish do you need anything
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-18 10:57 p.m.
I need a decision on a motion
Funpark22Funpark22
I need a decision on a motion
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 11:17 p.m.
mtd?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 11:17 p.m.
I will have him look at it .
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-18 11:17 p.m.
Yeah.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-18 11:18 p.m.
It's been 2 months since I've responded to the speedy trial motion
acarlyleacarlyle
Defense is moving for dismissal on the grounds of speedy trial violations. It has taken the State called this witness 3 days ago, was given 48 hours to question the witness, and we...
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 03:24 p.m.
@acarlyle
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 03:24 p.m.
are you still defense counsel
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 03:26 p.m.
judge richo has informed me that the motion to dismiss is denied
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 03:28 p.m.
also @Ocazius I believe judge richo assigned you this case for pretrial matters pursuant to § 2203.1
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 03:28 p.m.
which is why this is under his category
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
also @Ocazius I believe judge richo assigned you this case for pretrial matters pursuant to § 2203.1
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:06 p.m.
I’ve confirmed with judge richo that he assigned ocazius the case temporarily under § 2203.1, so judge richo will continue the case himself from this point with my help
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:07 p.m.
@Ocazius thank you though, your help is appreciated and this was just a misunderstanding
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:18 p.m.
@acarlyle @Funpark22 sorry for the many pings. Judge richo has explained to me how he wants to go about this case. So here’s what we will do
- trial will be in-game. Judge richo may not be present, but I will be
- we will open a thread under this channel with a when2meet link made available to the state and the defense counsel (defendant may appear, but I will not require it because it is in-game and will complicate availability—insofar as any objections to this exist from either party, they must make them here timely)
- both parties must coordinate with their own witnesses (who come voluntarily) to make sure that they attend trial and are there to be called
- the court will entertain methods of bringing witnesses to court involuntarily (which both parties should know how to approach, if they want to do so) at any point and without time constraints given the nature of in-game trial
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:19 p.m.
All orders and decisions of judge ocazius are entered except for matters relating to contempt—inactivity will be handled separately, through sanctions
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-10-22 04:20 p.m.
I’m on mobile, messages aren’t loading but have personal pings here - am I needed for anything?
OcaziusOcazius
I’m on mobile, messages aren’t loading but have personal pings here - am I needed for anything?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:20 p.m.
No I was just saying a mistake was made
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:20 p.m.
Richo assigned you for pretrial matters not for the entire case
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:20 p.m.
But it was a misunderstanding and he thanks you for your efforts
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:20 p.m.
Your decisions thus far are recognized and he will take the case back now
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-10-22 04:21 p.m.
I don’t think I’ve ever presided over this case
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:21 p.m.
You have though
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:21 p.m.
The confusion is understandable given the delays
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:21 p.m.
Judge richo has unfortunately not been able to rule or reach this case for a while but he is back now
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-10-22 04:22 p.m.
OH LOL this is the MTD case
Ocazius
Ocazius 2025-10-22 04:22 p.m.
Anyways I’ll stop interrupting, thanks for letting me know
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:23 p.m.
Ofc
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:36 p.m.
And what capacity exactly are you on this case?
acarlyleacarlyle
And what capacity exactly are you on this case?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:36 p.m.
Hi I’m judge Richo’s clerk as I previously explained
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:36 p.m.
I’m relaying his orders and rulings here
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:37 p.m.
He has asked me to relay a standing order, so please let me forward that, one sec
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:37 p.m.
Yeah it aint appropriate for a clerk to preside over an in game trial
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:38 p.m.
Can you be quiet for a minute I’m going to forward something
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:38 p.m.
You can state what you want to say after
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:38 p.m.
But nonetheless, the PDO has to get a new attorney for this, because I serve in a Senior position of the DOJ.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:38 p.m.
Okay can you
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:38 p.m.
Say that after
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Can you be quiet for a minute I’m going to forward something
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:38 p.m.
Little bit of respect wouldnt go amiss. Clerk
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:39 p.m.
Counsellor
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:39 p.m.
Be quiet
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:39 p.m.
Okay
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:39 p.m.
Judge richo will address your concerns in due time, just have five minutes of patience so I can forward this here.
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Counsellor
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:40 p.m.
You’re his Clerk. All you should be doing is relaying his orders, not disrespecting Counsel. Unless the issue here is your unresolved issues because of me questioning your unethical behaviour?
acarlyleacarlyle
You’re his Clerk. All you should be doing is relaying his orders, not disrespecting Counsel. Unless the issue here is your unresolved issues because of me questioning your unethica...
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:41 p.m.
I need you to be quiet
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:41 p.m.
Just be quiet for a second
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:41 p.m.
Wouldnt be an issue if you didnt come dropping in being disrespectful.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 Server2025-10-22 04:50 p.m.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:51 p.m.
This includes disrespectful, savvy, or sarcastic remarks of any kind
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:51 p.m.
Judge richo is not accepting of disrespect in his chambers either to him or to me so keep that in mind
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:51 p.m.
@acarlyle Now, I believe you had a request
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:52 p.m.
You may submit it so that I may relay it to judge richo.
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Judge richo is not accepting of disrespect in his chambers either to him or to me so keep that in mind
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:53 p.m.
Is the Judge accepting disrespect to counsel by the Clerk? Just so that I am fully aware.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:55 p.m.
but like I said, PDO need to find another attorney for this, as my serving in a Senior position of the DOJ creates a conflict.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:55 p.m.
So for that reason, I must recuse as counsel.
acarlyleacarlyle
Is the Judge accepting disrespect to counsel by the Clerk? Just so that I am fully aware.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:57 p.m.
Is this sarcastic
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:57 p.m.
Because that's not allowed
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:57 p.m.
like I said 5 minutes ago
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:57 p.m.
Nope, it isnt. I hate that you think that everything I say is sarcastic.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:57 p.m.
Why would somebody ask "is the judge accepting disrespect to counsel by the clerk"
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:57 p.m.
Non-sarcastically
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:58 p.m.
Being sarcastic to an Honorable Clerk is so beneath me.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:58 p.m.
Okay
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Why would somebody ask "is the judge accepting disrespect to counsel by the clerk"
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:58 p.m.
Because it is a genuine question.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:58 p.m.
So you legitimately want to know whether judge richo is allowing me to be disrespectful?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:58 p.m.
I would like to know where I stand.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:58 p.m.
Because at the moment, it seems as tho it is acceptable for you to dish out, but when someone gives it back, its crime of the century.

Maybe consider speaking to others as you want them to speak to you.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:59 p.m.
I'll address your recusal in a moment
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:59 p.m.
I'm not dishing out
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:59 p.m.
But I don't think you understand how court dynamics work
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:59 p.m.
But, it doesn't matter. I am recused from this case, I can no longer serve as Defense Counsel.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:59 p.m.
You always need to be respectful to the person who is presiding
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 04:59 p.m.
You aren't presiding.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 04:59 p.m.
I'm speaking on behalf of richo
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:00 p.m.
Great, I am respectful to the Judge, because he has ethics, and is a good person.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:00 p.m.
Now like I said, I am recused from this case.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:00 p.m.
So I shall speak no more.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:00 p.m.
No
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:00 p.m.
Substitution of counsel doesn't come as "I must recuse, goodbye"
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:01 p.m.
You're an attorney and should know how to adequately proceed
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:01 p.m.
You must also inform your client adequately
acarlyleacarlyle
Great, I am respectful to the Judge, because he has ethics, and is a good person.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:01 p.m.
That said, is the implication here that you're not going to be respectful to me, because I'm unethical and not a good person?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:02 p.m.
That's what you're inferring, not what I said.
acarlyleacarlyle
That's what you're inferring, not what I said.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:03 p.m.
I'm asking what you said.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:03 p.m.
What did you say?
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
You must also inform your client adequately
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:03 p.m.
Are you advocating that I act unethically, Mr Clerk?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:03 p.m.
Is what I inferred correct?
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
What did you say?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:03 p.m.
I said that I will always remain respectful of the Judge because he has good ethics and is a good person.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:03 p.m.
But you're implying that you will not be respectful to me, because, conversely, I don't have good ethics and am not a good person.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:03 p.m.
You merely inferred that it was a dig at you because you have a prejudice against me, perhaps from the Judicial Complaint that I filed against you for unethical conduct?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:03 p.m.
Is that correct?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:04 p.m.
I'm not implying anything.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:04 p.m.
I said exactly what I mean...
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-22 05:04 p.m.
Please don't be disrespectful to court staff
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-22 05:04 p.m.
Clerk is here to ensure a speedy trial
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:04 p.m.
@Fish resolve a substitution of counsel please.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:04 p.m.
if you're going to ask people to substitute for your client, do it elsewhere
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:04 p.m.
not in the case chat
RichosteinRichostein
Clerk is here to ensure a speedy trial
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:04 p.m.
If he wishes to remain respectful to me, he'll get the same back. But insinuations of unethical conduct, and such other disrespectful remarks don't fit under that bracket, Your Honor.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:04 p.m.
ask him privately
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-22 05:05 p.m.
No disrespect to court staff read chamber info, no additional warnings
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:05 p.m.
I wont sit here and disrespect people for the fun of it, but if they're gonna sit there and do that, I'm not going to sit silent.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-22 05:06 p.m.
If there is any additional you will be sanctioned or held in contempt
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-22 05:06 p.m.
You've received all the warnings you can be given
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:06 p.m.
That's fine Your Honor, I'll sit in silence.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:07 p.m.
Alright
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:07 p.m.
@acarlyle like I said if you want to recuse that's fine but judge richo requires that you actually follow procedural requirements for doing so
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:07 p.m.
Do you know what they are
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:07 p.m.
See above.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:07 p.m.
Which message
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:10 p.m.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:10 p.m.
@acarlyle Are you able to talk in this channel?
acarlyleacarlyle
That's fine Your Honor, I'll sit in silence.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:11 p.m.
Yes I am. Thank you for your concern. See above.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:11 p.m.
Okay
acarlyleacarlyle
Yes I am. Thank you for your concern. See above.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:11 p.m.
Why are you communicating with me outside of the case chat, contrary to the standing order
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:11 p.m.
because it has nothing to do with the case.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:12 p.m.
Are you not making remarks implying I'm not giving you decency in this case?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:12 p.m.
No, it was a personal issue that was raised outside of this case.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:12 p.m.
It was OFR
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:12 p.m.
OTR*
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:12 p.m.
Okay, can you tell me in what context (outside of this case) I am a clerk and have, in your eyes, disrespected you then?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:13 p.m.
No, because it is a personal issue that doesn't require to be on the record.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:14 p.m.
You putting it on the record is fishing for some form of discipline.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:14 p.m.
You're referring to this case in your comment
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:14 p.m.
I am not a clerk in any other case you're appearing for
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:14 p.m.
You've already been warned to follow the standing order and be respectful, so do so
acarlyleacarlyle
See above.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:15 p.m.
Can you tell me which message
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
You're referring to this case in your comment
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:15 p.m.
When and where?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:15 p.m.
Again, you're making the inferences in the most negative way possible. Which makes my off the record comment more and more valid.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:15 p.m.
Okay
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:16 p.m.
I'm glad you got that out of your system
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:16 p.m.
You're still referring to me in my performing this case in your comment
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:16 p.m.
Stop talking about it and just help me out with your recusal situation
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:16 p.m.
You're here to represent your client not yourself and you're doing him a disservice by not telling me how you're going to go about recusal
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:17 p.m.
I've made it perfectly clear about this recusal. Again you making inferences and misjudgements in the most negative way possible. So if you don't mind, I am going to disappear from this case channel, because I say something that results in a huge fine.
acarlyleacarlyle
I've made it perfectly clear about this recusal. Again you making inferences and misjudgements in the most negative way possible. So if you don't mind, I am going to disappear from...
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:19 p.m.
I don't want you to criticize what I am about to say in any way
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:19 p.m.
If you disagree too bad
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:19 p.m.
But all you have to do is be respectful, and you will not be slapped with a fine
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:19 p.m.
So far, you've disrespected court staff and disregarded orders
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:19 p.m.
Don't do that, and you're good
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:20 p.m.
Tell me how you're going about recusal because otherwise your client is the one who is going to be affected
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:20 p.m.
You do the same then. All you seem to be doing is aggravting
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:20 p.m.
Okay
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:20 p.m.
Do you see why I tell you not to criticize what I say?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:20 p.m.
I've already told you, how I am
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:20 p.m.
Each time I tell you to be respectful, you're disrespectful and you attack me
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:20 p.m.
Stop
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:20 p.m.
I HAVE ASKED THE CHIEF PUBLIC DEFENDER TO SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:20 p.m.
Is that big and bold enough?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:20 p.m.
Okay
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:21 p.m.
So you're making efforts to locate a new attorney for your client?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:21 p.m.
That's okay thank you
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:21 p.m.
I'm not going to justify that question with an answer.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:21 p.m.
Can you be respectful
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:21 p.m.
please
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:21 p.m.
please :🙏:
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:22 p.m.
Fill out the when2meet since you're still counsel of record @acarlyle
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:22 p.m.
when you find a replacement let me know
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:22 p.m.
I'll be sure to let the Judge know of a substition of counsel
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:24 p.m.
Great
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:24 p.m.
Thank you
acarlyleacarlyle
I'll be sure to let the Judge know of a substition of counsel
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:25 p.m.
You haven't filled out the when2meet though so please do that too
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:34 p.m.
Chamber bailiff @nooflyw
nooflyw
nooflyw 2025-10-22 05:34 p.m.
:👋:
nooflyw
nooflyw 2025-10-22 05:36 p.m.
I ORDER the Attorney calm down :😠: - Upon the orders of the Honorable Judge Richostein
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-22 05:36 p.m.
I'm thrilled?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:36 p.m.
THANK YOU Honorable Chamber Bailiff Nooflyw.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:36 p.m.
ᴘᴄ
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 05:41 p.m.
@acarlyle I need you to confirm you'll fill out the when2meet
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
ask him privately
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-23 08:47 a.m.
No ex parte, please
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-23 08:48 a.m.
Will fill out when I can
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-23 08:49 a.m.
I agree with the counselor here in regards to his opinion on a clerk presiding
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-23 08:50 a.m.
Notwithstanding the order, there is still an aspect of due process missing here. The defendant is to be put in front of an unbiased judge. In my opinion, this judge must be approved and confirmed by the senate or else isn’t an actual judge
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-23 08:50 a.m.
Even though the clerk might be an attorney, he is not a judge or even a magistrate judge for that matter
Funpark22Funpark22
No ex parte, please
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 02:01 p.m.
..?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 02:01 p.m.
ex parte with him and another lawyer?
Funpark22Funpark22
I agree with the counselor here in regards to his opinion on a clerk presiding
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 02:01 p.m.
Don't worry, I'm not presiding
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 02:01 p.m.
Judge richo is, I'm just his proxy(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 02:02 p.m.
The defendant will be before the judge's will, just that he might not be able to be there physically (conversely, he might be able to be there, we simply don't know yet)
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-23 04:52 p.m.
Yeah, I’m not proceeding with a proxy. If the Judge cannot be present, then he must ask this case be reassigned.

You being a proxy prejudices my client.
acarlyleacarlyle
Yeah, I’m not proceeding with a proxy. If the Judge cannot be present, then he must ask this case be reassigned. You being a proxy prejudices my client.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 05:03 p.m.
You may put this in a motion if you want
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 05:03 p.m.
It will be much better since judge richo feels you've flooded the case chat enough
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 05:03 p.m.
Be respectful though, if you don't want a proxy you need to respectfully request, not absolutely demand
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-23 05:08 p.m.
Yeah I’m getting bored of you constantly saying “be respectful”.

Come on, come out with what you actually want to say.


I am not allowing my client to be subject to you proxying for the Judge.

Especially given your extreme prejudice and bias against me. My client would be miles behind straight away. Not happening. If you attempt to proxy over any sitting, it will be brought up on appeal, and this whole trial will be de novo.

So if the Judge wants to save going through this all again, this needs to be reassigned, or he needs to actually be present.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-23 05:09 p.m.
@Kezzera I am now notifying you as Chief Judge that there is a District Court Clerk trying to preside over a matter under the guide of being a “proxy”
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-23 05:10 p.m.
And I ask that you exercise your authority as Chief Judge to ensure that justice is carried out by someone on the bench. Not someone who aspires to be on the bench.
acarlyleacarlyle
Yeah I’m getting bored of you constantly saying “be respectful”. Come on, come out with what you actually want to say. I am not allowing my client to be subject to you proxying ...
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 07:47 p.m.
I don’t want to say anything besides what I told you
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 07:47 p.m.
And I’m not prejudiced against you, nor am I presiding over anything(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 07:48 p.m.
However the standing order signed by judge richo expressly prohibits this kind of reconsideration-seeking behavior, so please respect judge richo’s decision and appeal if you disagree
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 07:48 p.m.
You and @Funpark22 must fill out the when2meet in When2meet before sunday pursuant to judge richo’s request(edited)
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-23 07:50 p.m.
If you continue to disrespect court staff and slow down this case you will be sanctioned or contempted, I've told you yesterday it would be our last warning @acarlyle
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-23 07:50 p.m.
If I need to set deadlines for each task then that will be done
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-23 08:00 p.m.
If any deadlines are to be set it will also be relayed here by court staff
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-23 08:00 p.m.
@nooflyw will ensure compliance
nooflyw
nooflyw 2025-10-23 08:15 p.m.
:✌️:
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 09:26 p.m.
Ok judge richo has decided to continue the trial over discord again @acarlyle @Funpark22
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 09:26 p.m.
he says to start over since the state only asked a few questions
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 09:27 p.m.
so we'll rewind to after opening statements
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 09:27 p.m.
state has 24 hours to call their first witness
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 09:28 p.m.
along this, they must ask all of their questions in a block-fashion
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 09:28 p.m.
numbered
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 09:28 p.m.
the witness will then have 24 hours to answer in the same block fashion
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 09:28 p.m.
@nooflyw please enforce this new deadline.
nooflyw
nooflyw 2025-10-23 10:21 p.m.
State must call their witness, in block questions, 3 months ago.
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
You and @Funpark22 must fill out the when2meet in When2meet before sunday pursuant to judge richo’s request(edited)
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-23 11:31 p.m.
Will do before Sunday. I lost access to the thread…
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-23 11:32 p.m.
Now I see it
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-23 11:32 p.m.
I request an extension due to me being at school relatively late tonight and not being able to get on
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-23 11:32 p.m.
Also the fact that I have no idea about availability tmr
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-23 11:32 p.m.
Caught me off guard and at a wrong time
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-23 11:42 p.m.
At least some security for me. Ext of about 2-3 hours
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 12:14 a.m.
So a mistrial has been declared or?
RichosteinRichostein
If you continue to disrespect court staff and slow down this case you will be sanctioned or contempted, I've told you yesterday it would be our last warning @acarlyle
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 12:14 a.m.
If you wish to sanction me for pointing out how you allowing your Clerk to “proxy” is prejudicial to my client then go for it Your Honor.
acarlyleacarlyle
So a mistrial has been declared or?
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 12:18 a.m.
No
acarlyleacarlyle
If you wish to sanction me for pointing out how you allowing your Clerk to “proxy” is prejudicial to my client then go for it Your Honor.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 12:18 a.m.
No
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 12:18 a.m.
Then the State’s first questions must be on the record if no mistrial is declared.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 08:39 a.m.
Can I get my ext, please?
acarlyleacarlyle
Then the State’s first questions must be on the record if no mistrial is declared.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 10:23 a.m.
Make a motion if you want
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 10:24 a.m.
@Funpark22 we’re not doing the when2meet anymore, trial will be over discord in block questions and block answers
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 10:25 a.m.
You have 12 hours to call your witness and simultaneously ask all your questions to that witness
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Make a motion if you want
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 10:26 a.m.
I shouldnt have to. That is basic procedure?
acarlyleacarlyle
I shouldnt have to. That is basic procedure?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 10:27 a.m.
Judge richo is deciding you need to make a motion
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 10:27 a.m.
That decision is final, see the standing order
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 10:27 a.m.
If you disagree with it, you can appeal at the end of this trial
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 10:27 a.m.
He and I are getting very tired of you contesting his decisions all the time
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Judge richo is deciding you need to make a motion
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 11:30 a.m.
That’s fine, we’ll preserve for appeal for violating my clients rights to due process.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 11:30 a.m.
Ok
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 11:30 a.m.
Great
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 11:30 a.m.
That's noted
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
He and I are getting very tired of you contesting his decisions all the time
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 11:31 a.m.
Your opinion is frankly irrelevant, I dont seem to understand why you believe you’re the judge on this case
acarlyleacarlyle
Your opinion is frankly irrelevant, I dont seem to understand why you believe you’re the judge on this case
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 11:31 a.m.
@Richostein
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 11:48 a.m.
If he wishes to sanction me for pointing out something relevant and truthful, he can.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 11:48 a.m.
Perhaps we can stop pretending to be a Judge and there would be far less issues
nooflyw
nooflyw 2025-10-24 11:56 a.m.
there's a difference between being 'relevant and truthful' respectfully and not
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 11:57 a.m.
Just like there is a difference between Clerk & Judge, yet it looks like one has become the other!
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 11:58 a.m.
@nooflyw
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 11:58 a.m.
Bailiff
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 11:58 a.m.
Please order defense counsel to be quiet
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 11:58 a.m.
What is going on currently is a complete and utter violation of the Defendant’s rights to due process.

A Clerk presiding over the matter, bolstered by the fact that clear is entirely prejudicial against the Defendant’s Counsel.

And a trial that is being “re-done” without a mistrial being declared.

This is beyond reprehensible.
nooflyw
nooflyw 2025-10-24 11:59 a.m.
Ordered to cease discussion in this channel until permitted @acarlyle.
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Please order defense counsel to be quiet
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 11:59 a.m.
Get the actual Judge to issue a gag order, then he can.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 12:38 p.m.
PAPERLESS ORDER: Given defense counsel's repeated disrespectful and contumacious conduct toward the Court and its officers, such as his reiterated mocking of the Court's clerk, npz_v, by making comments including that he is "pretending to be a judge", and calling his opinion "quite frankly irrelevant", especially after being warned on multiple occasions to stop, the Court finds that it has no choice but to sanction Mr. MatthewSandringham. Accordingly—it is hereby ORDERED that Mr. MatthewSandringham be HELD in direct criminal contempt of court; and it is hereby ORDERED that Mr. MatthewSandringham be SENTENCED to thirty (30) minutes in the Clark County Corrections Facility, and REMANDED to the custody of the Sheriff. Signed by Judge Richostein (Entered: Oct. 24, 2025).

@acarlyle @nooflyw
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 12:39 p.m.
Will be issued in game in the next few hours
acarlyleacarlyle
Get the actual Judge to issue a gag order, then he can.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 12:48 p.m.
you know that's not what a gag order is right
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 12:49 p.m.
an order telling you to be quiet in the midst of a legal proceeding before a court is not a gag order
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 12:49 p.m.
a gag order is an order by the court that prohibits the parties from disclosing certain information to the public
RichosteinRichostein
PAPERLESS ORDER: Given defense counsel's repeated disrespectful and contumacious conduct toward the Court and its officers, such as his reiterated mocking of the Court's clerk,...
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 01:26 p.m.
Thats fine, I will appeal. :🤷‍♂️:
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 01:27 p.m.
But if you want me to sit back and watch you and your Clerk/Judge minion thing violate my clients right to due process, you’re most certainly wrong.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 01:27 p.m.
30 minutes for stating hard truth is crazy work.
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
you know that's not what a gag order is right
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 01:28 p.m.
I’m not bothered by your opinion Mr Clerk/Judge hybrid
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 01:37 p.m.
2nd count of contempt, 60 minutes now
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 01:38 p.m.
Maybe Your Honor could insist that his clerk not interrupt these proceedings? Unless he is not the Clerk and holds another role?

My understanding is that an Administrative Clerk is there to do administrative tasks, not to order Counsel around, not to throw disrespectful comments around and such other. But that’s only if he is a Clerk?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 01:39 p.m.
Defense will submit a motion to dismiss as well based on the flagrant abuses of due process that this court has caused.
acarlyleacarlyle
Maybe Your Honor could insist that his clerk not interrupt these proceedings? Unless he is not the Clerk and holds another role? My understanding is that an Administrative Clerk i...
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 01:41 p.m.
I do administrative tasks
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 01:41 p.m.
such as forwarding his orders and decisions here
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 01:42 p.m.
And you’re overstepping those administrative tasks by order counsel around, tell them to be quiet and much more.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 01:42 p.m.
No I'm not the one ordering you to do stuff
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 01:42 p.m.
Judge richo is
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 01:42 p.m.
I relay his message
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 01:42 p.m.
I already explained this to you
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 01:43 p.m.
Which makes absolutely no sense at all. Why can he DM you something which he can simply press two buttons and say it in this chat?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 01:43 p.m.
Hopefully you can start to see exactly why people are doubting who exactly is presiding over this case.
acarlyleacarlyle
Which makes absolutely no sense at all. Why can he DM you something which he can simply press two buttons and say it in this chat?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 01:43 p.m.
I'm sorry to see you disagree with judge richo's way of managing his cases
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 01:44 p.m.
You still need to be respectful
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 01:44 p.m.
I disagree with his Honor’s flagrant abuses of discretion and procedure by allowing his Administrative Clerk to preside over a case. Yes.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 01:44 p.m.
Ok
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 01:45 p.m.
i dont see why the administrative clerk is still arguing with me about this?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 01:45 p.m.
You’re literally aggravating this more and more.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 01:45 p.m.
nobody is arguing with you
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 01:45 p.m.
I literally just said ok
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-24 02:05 p.m.
(edited)
Appearance Request
Requester: @Toby
Party: Defence
Channel: state-of-mayflower-v-voync

A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
:⏳: Request expired.
Request ID: 724be8c43db0468a895dde16f400519d
ApproveDeny
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 02:06 p.m.
Anger management assistant ^
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 02:07 p.m.
@acarlyle is he your replacement
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 02:08 p.m.
No, I will be remaining on because I have decided to leave the DOJ. So me and toby are going to sit here and fight these abuses of process.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 02:08 p.m.
Oh I'm sorry to hear that you're leaving the DOJ
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 02:08 p.m.
or happy
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 02:08 p.m.
I'm not sure if it's a good thing for you but anyway
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-24 02:08 p.m.
Hello
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-24 02:08 p.m.
I've been requested to intervene
acarlyleacarlyle
No, I will be remaining on because I have decided to leave the DOJ. So me and toby are going to sit here and fight these abuses of process.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 02:08 p.m.
He will be second chair then yes?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-24 02:08 p.m.
on a complaint
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-24 02:09 p.m.
I will submit a letter in response to the letter my chambers received
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-24 02:09 p.m.
and this will be entered into the record
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 02:09 p.m.
hi Albert
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-24 02:09 p.m.
Hello
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
He will be second chair then yes?
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 02:09 p.m.
I will clarify once we have heard from the Chief Judge, as to where we stand.
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-24 02:10 p.m.
@Toby appears for Defence (approved by @Kezzera).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:06 p.m.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 02:10 p.m.
@Kezzera does your letter pertain to tobyrulles4568 appearing for the defense
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 02:10 p.m.
Hello
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 02:10 p.m.
Ok nevermind
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
@Kezzera does your letter pertain to tobyrulles4568 appearing for the defense
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 02:10 p.m.
I filed a judicial complaint
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-24 02:10 p.m.
No it's a JC
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 02:10 p.m.
Okay
TobyToby
I filed a judicial complaint
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 02:11 p.m.
Are you appearing as second chair for the defense
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 02:11 p.m.
yes
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 02:11 p.m.
Great thank you
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-24 04:02 p.m.
Transitional Case

This case existed prior to courts.clarkcounty.site shutting down. This card has been created to keep a record of the case’s existence; however, it will not be updated with past, present, or future case information.
Labels
Transitional Case, Criminal
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-24 04:03 p.m.
@Kezzera please upload attachments for State of Mayflower v. voync now. You can send multiple messages. Type done when finished.
Allowed types: application/pdf, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text/plain
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-24 04:03 p.m.
@Kezzera accepted 1 file(s). (Total: 1/5)
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-24 04:03 p.m.
@Kezzera You can upload 4 more — or type done.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-24 04:03 p.m.
done
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-24 04:03 p.m.
Uploaded 1/1 file(s).
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-24 04:04 p.m.
Response attached
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 04:12 p.m.
Thank you Your Honor.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 04:21 p.m.
@Kezzera Thank you, Your Honour. I respectfully ask whether your chambers have considered the request set out at the conclusion of my letter, seeking the transfer of this matter pending a formal investigation into the conduct of the current presiding judge in relation to these proceedings. I make this request out of serious concern that Judge Cornwall may no longer be able to remain impartial and may now harbour bias against the defence(edited)
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-24 04:42 p.m.
(edited)
Appearance Request
Requester: @Fish
Party: Contemnor MatthewSandringham
Channel: state-of-mayflower-v-voync

A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
:⏳: Request expired.
Request ID: 9f32c92945414744b55e056503764342
ApproveDeny
TobyToby
@Kezzera Thank you, Your Honour. I respectfully ask whether your chambers have considered the request set out at the conclusion of my letter, seeking the transfer of t...(edited)
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:19 p.m.
Asking for a transfer of this case because Matthew got contempted, by his own actions..?
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:19 p.m.
No
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:19 p.m.
Do tell us then
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:20 p.m.
I asked for a transfer as I have lodged a judicial complaint against you, as such I'm calling into question your ability to remain impartial and unbias in these proceedings
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:20 p.m.
My complaint actually has nothing to do with your contempt issuing
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:20 p.m.
thats what his appeal is for
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:21 p.m.
So you want to set an example that if anyone complains about a judge, that they can just get a free transfer?
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:21 p.m.
That's not exactly a good precedent to set, for the record I do not recuse or find reason to(edited)
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:21 p.m.
You're being investigated by the Chief Judge over a complaint the defence has filed, that is a clear conflict of interest, and a sound basis to call into question your ability to possibly remain impartial
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:22 p.m.
This isn't my first rodeo
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:22 p.m.
People can file complaints all they want
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:22 p.m.
I'm glad you feel that way
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:22 p.m.
that doesn't take away my point
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:26 p.m.
Motion for recusal, or lack thereof, is denied.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:26 p.m.
That's nice, but it wasn't directed to you, it was in my letter to the Chief Judge
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:26 p.m.
Chief Judge does not have power to remove me off this case
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:27 p.m.
Unless there is evidence of inactivity
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:27 p.m.
The Chief Judge has the power to assign and reassign cases as he sees fit
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:27 p.m.
It is not like my request is without basis or merit
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:27 p.m.
rather the opposite
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:27 p.m.
That is your opinion. We shall continue
TobyToby
@Kezzera Thank you, Your Honour. I respectfully ask whether your chambers have considered the request set out at the conclusion of my letter, seeking the transfer of t...(edited)
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:28 p.m.
@Kezzera Your Honour, I ask for your intervention once more in granting my request for reassignment of this case pending investigation of the presiding judge for his conduct in this matter
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:29 p.m.
Only the Supreme Court of Mayflower has the ability to remove a judge on a case. It has not since your judicial complaint
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:29 p.m.
Any further comments on the same notion of a recusal will also result in disciplinary proceedings against yourself.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 05:32 p.m.
A judge cannot decide on a motion for recusal, when the judge is the subject of the recusal.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:32 p.m.
I was just about to say this
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:33 p.m.
This is a violation of my clients 5th amendment right to due process
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:33 p.m.
Contempt issued in game
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:34 p.m.
@Richostein Please accept JamesGardai, he is appearing as Matthew's counsel in regard to the contempt you issued
judicialFLOWBotjudicialFLOW
Click to see attachment.(edited)
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:34 p.m.
His request is here
TobyToby
This is a violation of my clients 5th amendment right to due process
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:36 p.m.
The US Supreme Court has held that "[d] ue process guarantees `an absence of actual bias' on the part of a judge"
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:36 p.m.
He can request in in-re-matthewsandringham-contempt
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:36 p.m.
CC: @Fish
TobyToby
The US Supreme Court has held that "[d] ue process guarantees `an absence of actual bias' on the part of a judge"
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:37 p.m.
What case?
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:38 p.m.
State v. Ezell, 993 NW 2d 449 (2023)
TobyToby
State v. Ezell, 993 NW 2d 449 (2023)
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:38 p.m.
Link case?
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:39 p.m.
You said Supreme Court case, yet this is a Nebraska Court of Appeals decision...
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:39 p.m.
Supreme Court of Nebraska..
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:40 p.m.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:40 p.m.
Also, if you were well versed in the law, you would know that direct contempt of court does not require due process.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:40 p.m.
I was quoting
RichosteinRichostein
Also, if you were well versed in the law, you would know that direct contempt of court does not require due process.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:40 p.m.
Sorry?
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:40 p.m.
Am I talking about contempt?
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:40 p.m.
I think you're confused
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:41 p.m.
“To preserve order in the courtroom for the proper conduct of business, the court must act instantly to suppress disturbance or violence or physical obstruction or disrespect to the court when occurring in open court. There is no need of evidence or assistance of counsel before punishment, because the court has seen the offense. Such summary vindication of the court’s dignity and authority is necessary. It has always been so in the courts of the common law, and the punishment imposed is due process of law.” Cooke v. United States, 267 U.S. 517, 534 (1925)
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:41 p.m.
Again, am I talking about contmept
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:41 p.m.
*Contempt
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:42 p.m.
Matthews contempt is a separate issue, which will be handled by James(edited)
TobyToby
This is a violation of my clients 5th amendment right to due process
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:42 p.m.
e
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 05:42 p.m.
My co-counsel is not on about the contempt, frankly my co-counsel doesnt care about my contempt.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:42 p.m.
I'm not Matthews counsel
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:42 p.m.
What is a fifth amendment violation here?
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:43 p.m.
My client has the right to be tried by a neutral and impartial judge
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:43 p.m.
And how exactly am I not neutral and unbiased?
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:44 p.m.
Why are we discussing this
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:44 p.m.
This is not for you to consider
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:44 p.m.
You again haven't explained the basis of the motion to recuse. The motion to recuse is denied on the basis, again. Any further talk of recusal will lead to contempt.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:44 p.m.
We will continue with the proceedings.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:45 p.m.
No we won't
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:45 p.m.
Because you are barred from reviewing a request to recuse yourself(edited)
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:45 p.m.
Are you willingly disobeying the order of this Court?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-24 05:45 p.m.
May I point something out, dear Richo @Richostein
RichosteinRichostein
Are you willingly disobeying the order of this Court?
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:45 p.m.
You're violating my clients due process right
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:45 p.m.
as such I will be referring this to the Supreme Court
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:46 p.m.
You'll be held in contempt for continuing to disobey the Court
RichosteinRichostein
You again haven't explained the basis of the motion to recuse. The motion to recuse is denied on the basis, again. Any further talk of recusal will lead to contempt.
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 05:46 p.m.
You cannot decide on a motion to recuse...
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:46 p.m.
Let me write it up
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:46 p.m.
That's fine
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:46 p.m.
I tried to be reasonable by asking you why you question my impartiality, yet you want to play games.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:46 p.m.
I told you why I questioned it
RichosteinRichostein
You'll be held in contempt for continuing to disobey the Court
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 05:46 p.m.
That's a flagrant abuse of your discretion Your Honor. Simply for disagreeing with you is not any hinderance to the administration of justice.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:46 p.m.
Becausse I filed a judicial complaint against you
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:48 p.m.
That's called forum shopping and that's prohibited. Filing a complaint against a judge for the sole basis of removal from a case is unethical. You will be referred to the State Bar also.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:48 p.m.
That's fine
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:48 p.m.
Lets refer each other to every body that governs us
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 05:48 p.m.
We will submit an affidavit asserting that you are not fit to preside over this case due to a matter of personal bias and prejudice, pursuant to 5. M.S.C. 1 Section 2103.5, in which case you will cease to preside over the matter until another Judge decides that you have no personal bias or prejudice.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:50 p.m.
PAPERLESS ORDER The Court notes for the record that I personally issued direct instructions to Contemnor tobyrulles4568 not to discuss the recusal motions he had filed with the Chief Judge during these proceedings. Despite that clear directive, and after I expressly stated that the matter was acceptable and that the hearing would proceed, the Defendant responded, “No we won’t,” in open court.

Such conduct constitutes a deliberate refusal to comply with a direct judicial order and a continued effort to obstruct the orderly progression of this case. The Court finds Defendant’s behavior to be willful, contumacious, and obstructive of the administration of justice.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant tobyrulles4568 is HELD in direct criminal contempt of court; and it is further ORDERED that the Defendant be SENTENCED to thirty (30) minutes in the Clark County Corrections Facility, and REMANDED to the custody of the Sheriff forthwith.

Signed by Judge Richostein
(Entered: Oct. 24, 2025)
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 05:50 p.m.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 05:51 p.m.
That's fine
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 06:15 p.m.
@Richostein
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 06:15 p.m.
Hi
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 06:16 p.m.
please make a separate channel regarding my contempt
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 06:48 p.m.
# Affidavit in Support of Motion to Recuse
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_kimpKT1W10EVr9hxVlIYtXUtZiz2Vfv/view?usp=sharing

CC: @acarlyle @Richostein @Kezzera
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 06:49 p.m.
Now that an affidavit has been filed for recusal, we now ask that the Chief Judge decide on whether recusal is appropriate, or to assign this matter to another Judge to make that decision pursuant to 5. M.S.C. 1 Section 2103.5
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-24 06:50 p.m.
@Toby please upload attachments for State of Mayflower v. voync now. You can send multiple messages. Type done when finished.
Allowed types: application/pdf, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text/plain
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 06:50 p.m.
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-24 06:50 p.m.
@Toby accepted 1 file(s). (Total: 1/5)
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-24 06:50 p.m.
@Toby You can upload 4 more — or type done.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 06:50 p.m.
done
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-24 06:50 p.m.
Uploaded 1/1 file(s).
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 07:18 p.m.
Hi this isn't the UK
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 07:18 p.m.
Motion to recuse is denied
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 07:18 p.m.
If you continue to bring up this matter you will be contempted once more
RichosteinRichostein
Hi this isn't the UK
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 07:19 p.m.
What does that have to do with the price of cheese
RichosteinRichostein
Motion to recuse is denied
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 07:20 p.m.
You dont get to make this ruling, you’re violating statute by ruling on it.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 07:23 p.m.
@Richostein Please stop violating 5 M.S.C. 1 § 2103.5
acarlyle
acarlyle 2025-10-24 07:24 p.m.
As the statute says, you cease to preside over this, based on the affidavit asserting a bias or prejudice. Its now for the Chief Judge to either rule, or to assign for another judge to rule.
TobyToby
Click to see attachment.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 07:39 p.m.
Can you provide some more elaboration before I decide if this affidavit is timely and sufficient?(edited)
RichosteinRichostein
Can you provide some more elaboration before I decide if this affidavit is timely and sufficient?(edited)
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 07:44 p.m.
Elaboration about what
Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 07:45 p.m.
I'm in bed now, so if its a lot, it'll have to wait till tomorrow, if it's not ill do it on phone
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-24 07:58 p.m.
(edited)
Appearance Request
Requester: @vloqsouls
Party: GOD FEARING JUDGE
Channel: state-of-mayflower-v-voync

A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
:⏳: Request expired.
Request ID: 6c9dce8433224c0baaeb32d4824f3e4c
ApproveDeny
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-24 08:32 p.m.
@vloqsouls appears for GOD FEARING JUDGE (approved by @Richostein).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:06 p.m.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 08:32 p.m.
@vloqsouls WHAT DO YOU WANT HON. VLOQS
nooflyw
nooflyw 2025-10-24 08:35 p.m.
the blue jays game is on :🤫:
🤫2
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:49 p.m.
Still want me to call a witness? @Richostein
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:49 p.m.
At this point, we have gone back and forth so many times.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:50 p.m.
Like seriously, your honor.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:50 p.m.
With all due respect, you are awakened for small periods of time to ask what needs to happen with the consistent answer of the motion to dismiss for a speedy trial which you eventually denied.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:50 p.m.
But here we are.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:50 p.m.
In fact
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:51 p.m.
This case has been going on so long, that even I forgot what we were talking about before the MTD.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:51 p.m.
I am simply stating my opinion due to general atmosphere that has been rendered by the defense counselor, the court, and myself.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 11:55 p.m.
Some parties decided to steer the focus resulting in contempt for both of them
Funpark22Funpark22
Still want me to call a witness? @Richostein
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 11:56 p.m.
Yes continue, as previously started
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-24 11:56 p.m.
Stated
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:56 p.m.
I believe I have a state in chief stored away
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:56 p.m.
1 sec
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:56 p.m.
yep I do!
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:57 p.m.
Your honor
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:57 p.m.
You know how medal is an absolute bitch for not updating?
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:57 p.m.
@Richostein
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:57 p.m.
Well, looking back on it.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:57 p.m.
1. The victim is out of the server and completely left the clark county discord. See above.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:58 p.m.
2. The Exhibit A for the state no longer works.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:58 p.m.
Like the link is poof
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:58 p.m.
If you look at disclosure 4.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:58 p.m.
A medal link was sent in
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:58 p.m.
Lemme see if there's a backup
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-24 11:59 p.m.
We still got an expert witness and need be, I can ask for the investigating officer to say what happened as an expert on this case.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:00 a.m.
In fact
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:00 a.m.
Your honor
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:00 a.m.
At this point
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:00 a.m.
This case really should be dismissed for lack of speed
ryanryan
Pre trial will start at 5P CDT (12 minutes) and will last 240 hours ending 5P CDT 5/17
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:01 a.m.
In fact pre-trial started in may.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:01 a.m.
It has been so long that an entire summer vacation has passed and already half a semester of school.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:02 a.m.
At this point, the amount of time being held under this court, some of it I believe being jailed, severely outweighs the possible time that could be given from a guilty SDM, discharging, and unlicensed poss charge.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 12:02 a.m.
wait so
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:02 a.m.
If you feel opposed to my ideas, I'm dming my investigator for this case for a yt link if we even have it.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 12:02 a.m.
is all the evidence gone
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 12:02 a.m.
kk lmk
Funpark22Funpark22
Click to see attachment.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:03 a.m.
this is my discovery
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:03 a.m.
Exhibit A, a medal link, no longer works
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:03 a.m.
All dislosures work
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:03 a.m.
Except our lay witness is gone
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 12:03 a.m.
ah..
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 12:03 a.m.
we will dismiss
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:03 a.m.
Assuming I get a yt link, I ask if I can expand the expert witness's expertise to the case, not just firearms.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 12:04 a.m.
hm
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 12:04 a.m.
ok sure
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 12:04 a.m.
lmk soon
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:04 a.m.
And @Mechanelize isn't storing that evidence anymore
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:04 a.m.
As it's been 5 months.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-25 12:04 a.m.
At this point, it's sad.
Toby
Toby 2025-10-25 05:06 a.m.
@Richostein your continuance of this case is violating my clients right to due process and is hugely illegal. As such, not only will I be referring your further conduct to the Chief Judge, I shall be referring it to the Supreme Court for disciplinary proceedings upon disposition of the Chief Judges investigation.(edited)
Toby
Toby 2025-10-25 07:57 a.m.
Expect a motion for supervisory intervention.
Funpark22Funpark22
And @Mechanelize isn't storing that evidence anymore
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 11:15 a.m.
Ah
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 11:15 a.m.
Keep me updated
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 11:20 a.m.
@Funpark22
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 11:20 a.m.
Are you issuing a nolle prosequi
Toby
Toby 2025-10-25 11:26 a.m.
@Richostein Are you going to keep violating the law and ignore my affidavit
Toby
Toby 2025-10-25 11:30 a.m.
# Motion for Supervisory Intervention
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S9EnlPQweO3OSCRohgGd5A-hxGOppmyw/view?usp=sharing

@Kezzera Your Honour, this motion is directed to you, and not the presiding judge. We ask for this to be reviewed and ruled on expeditiously, or we will have to seek mandamus relief.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 11:31 a.m.
I have received no instruction as to such violation by SCOM, CJ or CDJ. The case shall continue as I’ve said multiple times
Toby
Toby 2025-10-25 11:31 a.m.
So you're violating state law then
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 11:32 a.m.
Your interlouctory appeal in this case has not been heard by SCOM yet neither has the proceedings been stayed
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 11:33 a.m.
So we will continue thank you
Toby
Toby 2025-10-25 11:33 a.m.
Who said that we filed an appeal
Toby
Toby 2025-10-25 11:33 a.m.
The only appeal filed was against the contempt
vloqsouls
vloqsouls 2025-10-25 03:29 p.m.
:fufu:
RichosteinRichostein
Are you issuing a nolle prosequi
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-25 03:51 p.m.
@Funpark22
TobyToby
# Motion for Supervisory Intervention https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S9EnlPQweO3OSCRohgGd5A-hxGOppmyw/view?usp=sharing @Kezzera Your Honour, this motion is direct...
Toby
Toby 2025-10-25 06:29 p.m.
I withdraw this
Toby
Toby 2025-10-25 06:29 p.m.
I will instead be filing a petition for writ of mandamus with the Supreme Court
Toby
Toby 2025-10-26 07:56 a.m.
@Richostein — I have filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition. Concurrently, I have submitted an Application for Stay of Proceedings before the Supreme Court.
RichosteinRichostein
@Funpark22
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-26 05:11 p.m.
Our evidence is poof....
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-26 05:11 p.m.
And this court has clearly violated (at this point) the Defendant's rights.
Funpark22
Funpark22 2025-10-26 05:12 p.m.
Do you mind if I do it verbally here instead of written.
Funpark22Funpark22
Do you mind if I do it verbally here instead of written.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-26 05:16 p.m.
Dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution and failure to produce evidence that was in discovery
RichosteinRichostein
Dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution and failure to produce evidence that was in discovery
Toby
Toby 2025-10-27 02:01 a.m.
Yeah you're done buddy
Toby
Toby 2025-10-27 02:01 a.m.
That ruling is ultra vires
TobyToby
Yeah you're done buddy
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-27 02:02 a.m.
@nooflyw Can you contain this violent and erratic attorney?
nooflyw
nooflyw 2025-10-27 02:03 a.m.
Hello please contain yourself violent and erratic attorney
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-27 02:03 a.m.
Thank you bailiff.
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-27 02:03 a.m.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-27 02:04 a.m.
@Toby
Toby
Toby 2025-10-27 02:04 a.m.
Learn how to abide by the law bud
RichosteinRichostein
Dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution and failure to produce evidence that was in discovery
Toby
Toby 2025-10-27 03:00 a.m.
For the record, this ruling and any ruling made after the submission of the section 2103.5 affidavit is void ab initio.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-27 09:22 a.m.
@Toby I hereby render you ineffective counsel for attempting to void a dismissal with prejudice that exonerates your client.(edited)
RichosteinRichostein
@Toby I hereby render you ineffective counsel for attempting to void a dismissal with prejudice that exonerates your client.(edited)
Toby
Toby 2025-10-27 09:32 a.m.
Your dismissal order isn't lawful to begin with
Toby
Toby 2025-10-27 09:32 a.m.
And how am I appealing your dismissal order
Toby
Toby 2025-10-27 09:32 a.m.
I filed a mandamus petition
Toby
Toby 2025-10-27 09:32 a.m.
Before you ordered that(edited)
Toby
Toby 2025-10-27 09:32 a.m.
Make that make sense
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-27 09:34 a.m.
You're not counsel
RichosteinRichostein used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-27 09:34 a.m.
Case Modified
@Richostein has removed @Toby from the case channel.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-27 09:34 a.m.
No stay has been issued meaning nothing is void. You are no longer counsel, goodbye
RichosteinRichostein
Dismissed with prejudice for want of prosecution and failure to produce evidence that was in discovery
CharlesLXV
CharlesLXV 2025-10-28 08:31 p.m.
@Xerxy .(edited)
RichosteinRichostein
PAPERLESS ORDER: Given defense counsel's repeated disrespectful and contumacious conduct toward the Court and its officers, such as his reiterated mocking of the Court's clerk,...
Richostein
Richostein 2025-11-05 11:39 p.m.
palced in game
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-19 08:22 p.m.
This can be archived
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-19 08:22 p.m.
This can be archived @adriann @profile
adriannadriann used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-19 08:23 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-19 08:23 p.m.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-19 08:23 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Volume XIV.
Exported 1047 messages